The Maariv employee who contacted me wished to converse without attribution. Apparently he read my post and wanted to discuss the issues I raised. We carried a fifteen minutes long phone conversation about journalism, ethics and blogging, which was surprisingly pleasant and intelligent. I conveyed my notion of ‘giving credit where credit is due’, he talked about legal issues and made a distinction between exclusive and non-exclusive items. Overall I felt there was room for dialogue, and so I suggested ending each item with an acronym that will indicate the source, e.g. [ph] for a Perez Hilton item, [td] for a Tyler Durden item and so forth. I also suggested he put his arguments into writing so that I would publish them on his behalf at the end of the original post, but he politely declined.

We ended the conversation with my insinuating I’ll keep an open eye for any changes, and this is exactly what I did:
Little by little evidence piled to suggest people at Maariv took my critique seriously and the amount of credited blurbs was on the increase. The phrasing started to change from “Julia Roberts was seen…” to “Blogger Perez Hilton reports that Julia Roberts…”, and non-exclusive items sported phrases such as “American tabloids report” et cetera.

All and all, and to my genuine surprise, it seemed my little insignificant rant about credit giving had made a difference on Carlebach street, and while not to the extend that I suggested, someone did instruct the gossip guy to dispense credits more freely and to change the general tone of the segment.

Following are some visual aids from the previous weeks. The green boxes indicate the items that directly credited Perez Hilton, but to truly appreciate the change of tone you must be able to read Hebrew:

Two-Nil.

Thanks!
xoxo
P

Similar Posts:

• Copy and Paste Journalism Courtesy of Israel’s Second Largest Daily
• Is Perez Good for the Jews?
• Israeli Newspapers Aren’t Dying – They Are Committing Suicide
• Walking Without Excessories Is Like Walking Around Naked
• Frivolous Murders and Frivolous Media

After conducting a short four day inquiry, I can say this:
- Out of 27 gossip items in Maariv – 18 can be traced back to similar posts that appeared on Perez, and usually exactly 48 hours before – that’s two out of every three items.
- One of the posts in Maariv appeared as an exclusive celebrity sighting on PerezHilton.com.
- The Hebrew phrasing is often eerily close to the English one.
- Only once was Perez credited for an item.

Of course there are some extenuating circumstances that should be mentioned:
As things happen in the world, Perez and other online gossip sites are reporting them almost instantly, while the printed press can only print them the next day, making it look like it is coming in second every time.
Also, it is common practice among bloggers to quote from other sources for the benefit of the blog’s readers, but credit is almost always given. In any case, there is no way to compare people who write for the fun of it and a reporter (to use the term loosely) which actually gets a salary for his work.

The sheer number of occurrences, similar wording, and quoting same figures, suggest someone on Maariv’s payroll has been slacking off by practicing some copy-and-paste journalism. The Maariv segment called ‘Global Swamp’ should really be called ‘Perez in Hebrew’, giving props to the guy that actually does any work.

Following are some visual aids from the last four days:

The green arrow indicates the single Maariv item that credited Perez Hilton.

Similar Posts:

• Copy and Paste Journalism Courtesy of Israel’s Second Largest Daily – A Follow-up
• Is Perez Good for the Jews?
• Israeli Newspapers Aren’t Dying – They Are Committing Suicide
• Walking Without Excessories Is Like Walking Around Naked
• Media Mention: Shahar Golan Interviews with Haaretz Newspaper